Public beta · Beaverton budget explorer · Interactive prototype
Information CommonsFrom public information to civic understanding
Beaverton profile
Beaverton / Money & government / Understanding the budget
Understanding Beaverton's budget

Follow the money across departments, revenue sources and years.

Choose any department from the full department list, inspect how spending has changed, and open General Fund revenue from broad source groups down to individual city-reported lines.

Public beta: FY2024-25 figures are preliminary year-end actuals. Some FY2022-23 department points remain estimates. Revenue groups below are Thrive presentation groups for public readability; the underlying city-reported source names remain visible.
General Fund department spending$93.6MFY2024-25 preliminary actual
Departments in current selector14General Fund published departments / lines with recovered data
External revenue shown$83.7MFY2024-25 preliminary actual; excludes other financing
Detailed revenue lines11plus internal financing as an optional line
Spending explorer

Choose a department, then follow it across time.

The department dropdown contains every General Fund department or department-level line currently recovered for FY2024-25. The table remains sortable so you can also compare the whole set at once.

Department trend
FY20-21 actualFY21-22 actualFY22-23 estimateFY23-24 actualFY24-25 preliminary actual
Programs underneath

DepartmentStatus / continuitySelected-year amountLatest YoYFY24-25 budget use
Primary sources: City of Beaverton FY2023-24 adopted budget system report and FY2024-25 Q4 financial report. Click a table row or use the dropdown to change the trend focus.
Sources, statuses & methods

FY2023-24 adopted budget system report: department/program histories and General Fund revenue classes. Open source ↗

FY2024-25 Q4 financial report: preliminary actual departments, detailed revenue lines, revised budget use and FY2023-24 comparisons. Open source ↗

Status rule: actual, preliminary actual, estimate and adopted values are never silently treated as identical observation types.